LinguaLatina.co.uk

The website dedicated to learning the noble Latin Language and reading Latin Literature

Home     Study Plan     Part 1     Part 2     Part 3     Exercises     School Exercises     Reference     Cornucopiae     View Gallery     Palaeography     Scripta Manent     Liber Homeri     Classics     PRO SOCII      
Measuring Time
Calendar
Root of PoS
Latin Literature
Cursus Honorum
Comitiae
Ordo Equester
Joint Stock Company
Roman Numerals
Fibonacci
Glossary
Weights & Measures
S.P.Q.R.
Fall of the Roman Empire
Computation Using Roman Numerals        
 
In this section I will discuss how Roman numbers were used in the daily life of the Roman people.  Roman Numerals, as a topic of the Latin grammar (numeric adjectives and adverbs) is dealt with in the module of Lesson 4.
 
So, how were the Roman numbers used in the Latin world of those days?  The numeric system that we know today was unknown then. Hence the digits 1, 2, 3, 4, etc. were not known. It was Fibonacci, in 1202, that introduced the Hindu numbers 1 to 9 into the Latin world, and even then they were not accepted till the XVI century.   More of this in the section on Fibonacci.  The concept of numbering and doing arithmetic with the Roman numbers was
IVXLCDM
10 50 100 500 1000 
known, but the symbols used to perform that numbering and calculations were taken from their alphabet. The basic set of numbers notation, and their equivalent modern numbers, are shown in the above table.
 
Method of Counting
Assumptions: I assume that you have zero knowledge of counting with Roman numerals. The term "unit" means anything, weights, miles,money, etc., e.g., one egg, three ducks for the party, two hundred asses (money not donkeys!), twenty bricks, etc.
 
Doubling the number I would make a count of 2, thus: II = two units.
Trebling the number I would make a count of 3, thus: III = three units.
Quadrupling the number I would make a count of 4, thus: IIII = four units.
 
Alternatively, four could have been written by using the two symbols I and V, and placing the smaller unit symbol, the I, to the left of the bigger symbol unit V. In this way four units, of something, could be shown as IV, instead of IIII.
 
From this explanation you can already imply the following rule: let's call it Rule I: When a smaller number is placed on the left hand side of a larger number, then its value is subtracted from the value of the larger number.
 
The opposite of this rule is also true, and let us call this opposite rule:
Rule II: If you put a smaller value number to the right of a larger value number, then the value of the smaller number is added to that of the larger number.
Thus, if you needed to write twelve units then you would write: XII 
Or if you wanted to write seventeen, you would write it as XVII.
 
What does the number IX mean?
By Rule I, its value is nine.
 
What does the number XVIII mean:
By Rule II, its value is eighteen.
 
With this line of reasoning you can see that it is quite easy to express any number. Here are a list of examples. For the sake of speed, I will show the corresponding value using our modern numeric notation.
 
XX = 20
XXX= 30
XXXX=40, but this notation is wrong; use instead Rule I, XL=40
L=50
LX= 60
LXX=70
LXXX=80
XC=90
C=100
 
This basic pattern is now repeated for any higher numbers.
CX=110
CXX=120
CXXX=130
CXL=140
CL=150
CLX=160
CLXX=170
CLXXX=180
CXC=190
CC=200
CCC=300
CD=400
DC=600
DCC=700
DCCC=800
CM=900
M=1000
MM=2000
MMM=3000
 
Managing Numbers Higher than MM
You use the dash symbol "-" placed on top of a number or a set of numbers. This dash symbol represented that number multiplied by 1000. Examples:
 

C̅= 100 000

X̅I̅I̅I̅ = 13000

X̅I̅I̅I̅DVI= 13506
 
M̅ = 1000 000
 
A further multiplier was used, perhaps more familiar to those practising the profession of banker (argentarius) and book keeping (ratio accepti et expensi), or accountant (rationarius).
The symbol was this one: |¯| and it signified x 100 000;
hence |X̅X̅| = 20x100 000 = 2 000 000
and  |X̅|X̅L̅V̅CLXVII = (10x100 000)+((45x1000)+67)= 1 045 167
 
A further multiplier existed. This was the symbol C written either side of a number and was derived from an alternative way of writing the number 1000. Instead of using the normal and more common M they used the C followed by the I and then by another C but written as if you were writing from right to left.  I am using the Times New Roman font for writing these notes, and such inverted C is not available in the character set. The best I can use is a cyrillic character that looks like an inverted C but has a dot in the middle of it, like this: Ͽ; just ignore the dot and let's use that as the inverted C symbol.
 
Thus: CnumberϿ would mean 10 x number.
         CCnumberϿϿ = 10x10xnumber = 100xnumber
         CCCnumberϿϿϿ=10x10x10xnumber = 1000 number
 
Hence the alternative way of writing 1000 was CIϿ
For example: CCIϿϿ = 10 x 1000
                     CCCIϿϿϿ = 100 x 1000
                     CCCCIϿϿϿϿ = 1000 x 1000 but in this case you coould use simply M̅ = 1000 x 1000.
 
N.B.: If you are interested in writing Roman Numerals in your documents higher than MM, then you might like to consider referring to the page PC Fonts for Sale and purchase a font set which includes all these special characters.
 

Arithmetic with Roman Numerals         

 

Addition

The rule for addition is simple: just take the numbers of the two addends to the right hand side of the equal sign, order them from highest to lowest and then count up.

 

Examples:

  1. LXVI + XXII = LXXXVIII = 88
  2. CVIII + LX = CLXVIII = 168
  3. CXXIV + VI = CXXVV because the two I cancel out as the one on the first addend is negative (-1+5), hence the reuslt is CXXX.
  4. XVI + VII = XVVIII=XXIII = 23
  5. XLVI + XXIV = LXVV = LXX  as one X and one I cancel out.
 

Subtraction

The rule here is to mentally calcel out the numbers of the subtrahend from those of the minuend. If you don't remember the minuend or subtrahend from your school days, then the minuend is the first one and comes before the minus sign, whereas the subtrahend is the second one and is written on the right hand side of the minus sign: like this:

                  minuend - subtrahend = some number

                      10       -       2           = 8

Examples:

  1. XII - I = XI
  2. XVII - VI = XI
  3. XVII -IV  ≠ XI but = XIII The trick here is to take the -I of the subtrahend and add it to the minuend, then take away the V of the subtrahend from the minuend; i.e.: XVIII-V=XIII.
    Remember, in Latin you always have to use your "ratio".
  4. CXXIV - IV = CXX
  5. CXXIV - VI = Do this one mentally, never mind the signs, and then write the answer. Here is one way: 124 minus 6. borrow four from the six gives 120 then take away the two from the X to give CXVIII.

It does involve using carries and borrows, but this is inevitable.

Multiplication

Multiplying two simple numbers is not difficult, you just use Pythagoras' table as your aid, much as we did at school ourselves.

IIIIIIIVVVIVIIVIIIIXX
II IV VI VIII XII XIV XVI XVIII XX 
 IIIVI IX XII XV XVIII XXI XXIV XXVII XXX 
 IV VIIIXII XVI XX XXIV XXVIII XXXII XXXVI XL 
 VXV XX XXV XXX XXXV XL XLV 
 VI XIIXVIII XXIV XXX XXXVI XLII XLVIII LIV LX 
 VIIXIV XXI XXVIII XXXV XLII XLIX LVI LXIII LXX 
 VIIIXVI XXIV XXXII XL XLVIII LVI LXIV LXXII LXXX 
 IXXVIII XXVII XXXVI XLV LIV LXIII LXXII LXXXI XC 
 XXX XXX XL LX LXX LXXX XC 

 

Examples:

  1. VII x VI = XLII (I assume you were a diligent pupil and studied your times table fully and not just up to 10, but at least 12 or more)
  2. CXXV x II = CCL   This is easy
  3. CXXV x VII = Reason as follows:
    VII times V is XXXV therefore                V and carry XXX                     V
    VII times X is LXX plus the XXX from the carry over is C                    C
    XII times the other X is LXX therefore                                                      LXX
    and VII times C is equal to DCC,                                                                 DCC
    hence the result is: DCC+LXX+C+V= DCCCLXXV QED

 

In this way you could tackle any complicated multiplication. But as it always happens, when you are at school you are always tought the difficult approach despite the teacher knowing that there is a simpler way. What was the simpler method? The vertical Roman computer, sorry, not Roman but Egyptian. It seems that the Egyptians had invented a numerical algorithm to make complex multiplications simple and fast. Here it is. Suppose we want to multiply two numbers such as, say, LXIV x XXIII. You would proceed as follows:

  1. Get your Roman palmtop out, the wax tablet.
  2. Write a vertical line with your stylus
  3. Choose one of the the two numbers to multiply, and write it on the top right hand side of the vertical line.
  4. Opposite to this number, i.e. on the left hand side of the vertical line, but in line with the number on the right hand side, write the number I, unus, one.
  5. Now proceed to double each of those two numbers on your palmtop wax tablet and write them just below; you should now have two rows of numbers. The second set being double the first set.
  6. Next, double the second set of numbers and write them down as a third set of numbers in the row below the first two, hence the third row.
  7. Continue this process until the last number on the left hand side of this doubling process is lower than the value of the second multiplicand which you did not choose to write as the first number on the right of the vertical line.
  8. Now you should have two columns of numbers, either side of the vertical line. Look at the left hand side column of numbers and choose those that added together are equal to the multiplicand.
  9. Then choose the corresponding numbers on the right hand side of the vertical line and sum them. The total is the answer to your multiplication.

 

An example will make the process very clear, and very simple.


This demonstration shows that the distributive property of multiplication has been known for millennia.

 

Division 

The procedure for doing divisions with Roman numerals is more cumbersome. Simple number divisions are quite straightforward. The problem is with large numbers. However we can use the same the wax table palmtop, again, and perform the same algorithm, except that for the division  we stop when the right hand side number would exceed the other number. For example, suppose we wish to do the following division: CMXXVII / XXXIII.  Note: CMXXVII is the divisor, and XXXIII is the divident. Take the divident and place it on the top of the right hand side of the vertical line. Now proceed doubling both side as was done for the multiplication, but ensure that you stop when the next multiple of the divident would exceed the value of the divisor.

 

See the illustrated example below:

 

Of course with divisions the distributive property of multiplications is not true, hence you always use the dividend.

 

The Abacus

I am tempted to cover this subject as it would produces some attractive illustrations. To do so, however, would require at least another web page.  In any case, the abacus was useful for making very fast additions and subtractions. It was not at all useful for divisions and multiplications, as far as I know, at least.